QUOTE(arnquist @ Oct 11 2007, 04:19 PM)

I haven't done the research, so you can totally ignore me if you like. Western medicine seems to be fairly effective for most things, but then again I've been taught to trust western medicine, so maybe I'm just biased. It seems like Chinese medicine does a better job of harnessing the body's natural healing powers while western medicine is all about killing the disease. Seems like they both could learn a thing or two from each other.
your perspective is a reasonable one. western medicine IS effective with a number of illnesses and diseases, but not even close to being able to say "most things." but then, a large part of it may depend on your definition of "effective."
lin gave a really good analogy with headaches as an example. the headache (ie, illness) remains, but if you take this drug you won't have to feel it. this attitude of "kill the effect; ignore the cause" is a recipe for chronic illness of pandemic proportions.
the way it's typically broken down is that western medicine is excellent for the treatment of acute illness, whereas eastern medicine excels in the realm of chronic illnesses. if you have a hernia, a broken leg, or a ruptured spleen, stay with the west. but if you have hypertension, tumors, or cancer, go with the east.
so they have their domains in which they tend to be most effective, and of course there's lots of overlap.
BUT...
when pharmaceutical lobbyists have the power to sway policy decisions (and they do. and they have.), you end up with a medical paradigm that promotes disease maintenance over actual cures.
"because the money's not in the cure; the money's in the medicine. in the comeback. that's how a drug dealer makes his money: on the comeback."
--chris rock
never thought i'd quote him, but he made a good point.
"kill the disease" typically means "poison the body," so our "cures," in effect, are actually creating diseases. but the goal is for THOSE diseases, the ones created by the so-called cure, to be manageable.
TCM will take a more holistic approach. rather than merely repairing or patching up what's broken, part of the goal is to understand how it got broken in the first place.
not only that, but TCM acknowledges that the body, when properly supported, can create it's own miracle cures, whereas western medicine tends to hurt the body while trying to k or numb it.
western vs. eastern = "attack the disease" vs. "enhance the righteous"