i agree with xeno for some points - what a coincidence
my own research shows me that taoists were scholars and savants, not self-sufficient idiots...
i agree with mantra 68 too, too much philosophy gets us nowhere
my own research has shown me that too much beating around the bush is counterproductive, so to speak
in the end, consider that kunlun may very well be something fit for people that prefer not to think too much
regarding shifu max as a system buster... on one way, it could be interesting... but only in a way that, when you bust a system that doesnt work, you replace it with another system... if you watch nature closely, systems are ways by which nature tries to couple condition and referrence together, to enhance survival and progress... individuality is scarce in nature... we talk mainly systems, ecosystems...
no offense ment, but this kunlun subject may interest some people around here, but not everyone... and everywhere i look, kunlun here, kunlun there... is just too much... please, wasnt tao about the middle way, not too much, not too little?
another thing, if you please. my discussions with other wise members of this community seem to agree on one point... we all seem to feel that what shifu max teaches is good, but it feels like something is so incomplete... i dont know if you know what i mean... we didnt participate on workshops and that, but from what you as practicioners made us feel about this kunlun... this feels to be the case...
i am only wondering and asking along, there is no need to be upset on that. i would really love to hear a clear point on that... up until now, matra 68, with all due respect, was very evasive... you may steal some attention with that system breaking-no theory theory, so what... there are still many that arent so convinced...
by the way, if i want to, i could have bliss 24-7
and i dont think bliss leads to liberation
liberation is liberation from all states, including bliss, isnt that what Lord Buddha said?
Little