Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: White Crane boxers?
The Tao Bums > Tao Lounge > Taoist Discussion
Brian L. Kennedy
Over the past year or so I have finally started to study Taiwanese Crane Boxing. Taiwan was well known for the quality and variety of its Crane Boxing. In modern times Taiwanese Crane Boxing has kind of fallen by the wayside but there still are some guys teaching. Crane Boxing uses a lot of imagery from Daoism.

Any folks here study any of the Crane Boxing systems?

take care,
Brian
Yue
I do. Sleeping crane style.
Qlites
I do White Crane but it is not from Taiwan. We have all the sleeping, jumping, eating, and calling crane in our system. I think there were one more in there but I forget. Where are you studying your??
Yue
QUOTE(Qlites @ Jan 18 2008, 02:40 PM) *

I do White Crane but it is not from Taiwan. We have all the sleeping, jumping, eating, and calling crane in our system. I think there were one more in there but I forget. Where are you studying your??


Believe it or not, I'm learning from YMAA books and videos. I would prefer a teacher, but I have no teachers anywhere near me, so I have to make due. Surprisingly, I'm learning pretty damn fast.
Brian L. Kennedy
The teacher simply refers to it as Fukien White Crane Boxing (福建白鶴拳). I am learning from a guy in my neighborhood of San Chung. What we started on was the 3 Battles form and a staff set.

It is interesting and there is quite of bit of historical research going on about the origins of the many Crane Boxing systems. One thing that is of particular interest is that it seems fairly solid that Wing Chun (the Bruce Lee/Yip Man art) is a branch of Crane Boxing. And if you look at the Crane Boxing hand sets it is quite obvious that there is a common origin.

The other thing that is kind of interesting about the Crane sets, at least the ones I have seen here in Taiwan, is that they are not particularly long. I am used to the long training routines that they have in Hung Gar, but Crane boxing is different; short sets, usually a repeat something 3 times pattern.

And one of the things I really like is the more practical stances. The crane boxing I do uses what amounts to a western boxing shuffle; easy on the knees, works in a fight; can’t do better than that.

Take care,
Brian
Mal
QUOTE(Brian L. Kennedy @ Jan 19 2008, 02:16 PM) *

It is interesting and there is quite of bit of historical research going on about the origins of the many Crane Boxing systems. One thing that is of particular interest is that it seems fairly solid that Wing Chun (the Bruce Lee/Yip Man art) is a branch of Crane Boxing. And if you look at the Crane Boxing hand sets it is quite obvious that there is a common origin.


QUOTE

In 1644 AD, the Manchurian tribe had invaded China and defeated the Ming dynasty rulers. Ming loyalist, nobles and soldiers, escaped and went south. As pointed by the Wushu historian Salvatore Canzonieri, many of this rebels relocated in the The Honan Shaolin. The Ching rulers discovered the temple was a focus of resistance and they burned Songshan Shaolin in 1768.

After the destruction of the temple many of the Chu family and other nobles and also many Shaolin monks from Honan moved to the South Shaolin temples (Fujian and Jian Shi). The Chu Gar style legend mentions Tang Chan, (his real name was Chu Fook Too or Chu Fook To), who belonged to the Ming Imperial court (1) as one of this rebels that emigrated to the Southern temples.

At the Fujian temple (located in the Nine Little Lotus Mountains) the monks and rebels shortened the time it took to master the boxing styles from 10 years to 3 years with the purpose of train quickly the fighters to overthrow the Ching rulers and restore the Ming dynasty. The Chu Gar legend says that Chu Fook Too became abbot in the Fujian temple and changed his name to "Tung Sim" (anguish) due to his deep anguish and hatred for the Ching's reign of terror and suffering. In the style's legend he was the person that developed the Southern Praying Mantis style.

The monks (or Chu Fook Too himself) developed kung fu fighting styles that were faster to learn, based on close range fighting, designed to defeat a martial art skilled opponent (Manchu soldiers and Imperial Guard) with fast, powerful chains of attacks that left no time for counter-attacks. If we take as an example of those styles the Southern Praying Mantis one, we will see that it is a way of boxing developed with one purpose in mind: destroying the enemy. Restore the Ming; overthrow the Ching, was the primary purpose of the Southern Praying Mantis and the slogan of the day. It was violence of the Manchu rulers as they hunted down and destroyed revolutionaries of the Ming dynasty that caused Southern Praying Mantis to develop into a direct, deadly fighting style --- destroy the enemy before being destroyed. Some of the Fujian styles were actually used in battles against the Manchu and also in the Boxer Rebellion, and many of the southern styles originated from this common root, for example:

* Wu Zu Quan or Go Cho Kune (Five Ancestors Boxing)
* Yong Chun Quan (Wing Chun)
* Fujian Bai He Quan (Fujian White Crane Boxing)
* Bak Mei (White Eyebrow)
* Lung Ying (Dragon boxing)
* and the styles we are interested in, known with the generic name of Southern Praying Mantis.

Some of these styles are so technically related that seem to be just variations of each other with different legends about their origins. There is not to much difference between most of these southern styles, the differences are small and they share lots of technical similarities, for example the starting stance, chain punches, rounded shoulders stances, elbows kept close to the body protecting the ribs, tight stance protecting the groin, the use of whipping power, the use of phoenix eye fist (except for dragon style).

Against this theory of the common root in the Shaolin Fujian temple, I was told that Sifu Chueng Lai Chuen (Bak Mei master), Sifu Lam Yuei Kwai (Lung Ying Pai) and Sifu Lao Sui (Chu Gar/Chow Gar Gao) used to visit the same master in a tea house in Hong Kong in the late 40's. That would suggest all this new branches were originated in the XX century. In addition, some Lung Ying practitioners say that Bak Mei is just Lung Ying with a nice legend Sifu Chung Lai Chuen attached to this new style to differentiate it from the original one. This theory would easily explain the similarities of this styles, but it is difficult to explain such an amount of differences in just one generation. That is the reason I tend to think the most appropriate theory is the one that establishes that this styles have a common root, but they have been differentiating each other with the transmission from generation to generation during centuries.

Of course there are differences. When we talk particularly about the Southern Praying Mantis, the Hakka Southern mantis looks a lot closer to the Wu Zu Quan (Go Chu Kune) root than the Southern mantis that comes from Chu Gar and Jook Lum. Southern mantis looks like a refined version of the Wu Zu Quan movements. At the same time, the stances, footwork and weighting are different when we compare the Jook Lum to the Chu Gar. Many times it has been said that Fujian Bai He Quan (Fujian White Crane Boxing) and Wu Zu Quan are the origin of the Japanese Karate. It is true that Wu Zu Quan style has exactly the same Sanchin form that the Uechi Ryu and Goju Karate styles (with some differences in the tension, and the Chinese version includes two-man version). But Uechi Ryu has a form called Som Bo Gin (Three Arrow Fist), the most famous southern praying mantis form, and both form have similar movements and also the Uechi Ryu foot movements mimic those of Southern Mantis. In addition most Okinawan and Japanese forms follow the same numerology, such as, San Chin Kata (3 steps), Seipa Kata (18), Sanseiru kata (36) and Pechurin Kata (108). May be these similarities between Karate and Southern Mantis are due to the common origin in the Fujian temple, but may be was Southern Praying Mantis, and not Wu Zu Quan the style that originated the Okinawan Karate...

The relation, or should be better to say the lack of relationship between Northern Mantis and Southern Mantis is similar to the Fujian White Crane and Tibetan White Crane. They seem to have absolutely nothing in common but the name. Why the southern style took the Praying Mantis name will be discussed later.


Extracted from a net document Southern Praying Mantis system written by F.Blanco. Fernando told me that his document ended up offending a lot of people and he took down all of the copies. At least he though so until I found one many years ago and contacted him about it smile.gif It a shame as it is a really great article, people get so sensitive about their lineages etc....

Brian, glad you are enjoying Fukien White Crane Boxing
QUOTE(Brian L. Kennedy @ Jan 19 2008, 02:16 PM) *

works in a fight; can’t do better than that


The only test of REAL Kung Fu
Brian L. Kennedy
Hi Mal,
Yeah, I am enjoying it quite a bit. Thanks much for the post about the history. And it comes as no surprise that that article caused some discomfort.

To kind of add to what the article said, a friend of mine, a martial arts historian named Stan Henning, is starting to take the position that most "short armed" southern systems (i.e. Wing chun, Hung Gar, Crane boxing, Mok Gar and the rest) were all derived from martial arts systems brought to southern China by General Qi Ji Guang (戚繼光)(1528-1587) when he was in the delta region doing the pirate/brigand suppression. A lot of his troops were decommissioned in the south and they could have spread the northern forms they knew from their military training into the south.

I am very much starting to agree with Stan Henning on that.

take care,
Brian
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.