QUOTE(ccot)
Hi guys,
I came across this recently and was wondering if anyone could shed some light on how this might effect practice, in the context of the microcosm in the body reflecting the macrocosm of the solar system...
"Scientists have gone on record to predict "the next solar cycle will be up to 50 percent stronger than the previous." (NASA) ---- It is known as Cycle 24 and is expected to be as much as 50 percent stronger than its predecessor C-23.
"To present a frame work of just what "50 percent stronger" might look like, let's go back to Cycle 23. In this cycle we witnessed sunspot counts into the 400's. The prediction for Cycle 23's 'apex' or (maximum) issued by NASA was 150. The count had more than doubled. We also witnessed the largest solar flare ever recorded on November 4th 2003 known as the "Halloween Flare". This solar flare, and following CME, was so large it literally pegged the needles on all gages. It buried all the instruments which measure magnetic flux and charged particles. It literally shocked the science community.
"At the time, the instruments to measure the strength of a solar flare and CME showing its and its affect on our (Earth's) magnetic field, only went to 9. Until this day, an X-9 was the largest flare recorded. On November 4th 2003 a solar flare and following CME (coronal mass ejection) exploded just as it began rotating over the western limb of the Sun. If it had been just 48 to 72 hours earlier, the flare would have been Earth directed and we would have experienced a direct hit.
"The strength of this event measured an X-40, of which such strength had never been witnessed or anticipated. Even to this day we can only speculate the damage it would have caused to our power grids, satellites, GPS, and any number of devices which depend on communication or directional satellites."
I don't know how accurate the information is but it seems to be relatively legitimate.
Any opinions, insights?
Chris.
I came across this recently and was wondering if anyone could shed some light on how this might effect practice, in the context of the microcosm in the body reflecting the macrocosm of the solar system...
"Scientists have gone on record to predict "the next solar cycle will be up to 50 percent stronger than the previous." (NASA) ---- It is known as Cycle 24 and is expected to be as much as 50 percent stronger than its predecessor C-23.
"To present a frame work of just what "50 percent stronger" might look like, let's go back to Cycle 23. In this cycle we witnessed sunspot counts into the 400's. The prediction for Cycle 23's 'apex' or (maximum) issued by NASA was 150. The count had more than doubled. We also witnessed the largest solar flare ever recorded on November 4th 2003 known as the "Halloween Flare". This solar flare, and following CME, was so large it literally pegged the needles on all gages. It buried all the instruments which measure magnetic flux and charged particles. It literally shocked the science community.
"At the time, the instruments to measure the strength of a solar flare and CME showing its and its affect on our (Earth's) magnetic field, only went to 9. Until this day, an X-9 was the largest flare recorded. On November 4th 2003 a solar flare and following CME (coronal mass ejection) exploded just as it began rotating over the western limb of the Sun. If it had been just 48 to 72 hours earlier, the flare would have been Earth directed and we would have experienced a direct hit.
"The strength of this event measured an X-40, of which such strength had never been witnessed or anticipated. Even to this day we can only speculate the damage it would have caused to our power grids, satellites, GPS, and any number of devices which depend on communication or directional satellites."
I don't know how accurate the information is but it seems to be relatively legitimate.
Any opinions, insights?
Chris.









