QUOTE(.broken. @ Oct 11 2008, 04:52 PM)

Interesting thread. Haven't had time to read the book, but I'd thought I'd share my words with you...
Pornography wouldn't be anywhere as near as large an industry as it currently is (seconded by drugs) if men were in charge of their sexual desires.
Perceived gender roles play a great part in this equation. Women impose a need upon themselves to look a certain way to attract the insatiable sexual appetites of uncoath men and to beat the competition of other females. Men impose a need upon themselves to have intense sexual desires to compete with other men and to attract a woman that looks a certain way, again, to compete with other men. The error lies in the fact that these are all reactions to social contact and how we believe we should act in our culture and society.
From this self created competition, humans have created whole industries, which in themselves are competitive. Fashion and pornography are remarkably interlinked in creating the imagined perfection we seek in partners and in ourselves. One only needs to look at the pin-ups from the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s to see how this imagined perfection changes. Competition never stands still.
Sex being treated as taboo hardly helps attitudes toward pornography either. Sex is as normal as eating. Merely a bodily function which acts as a means to an end. Treating it as something distasteful or alien festers misunderstanding. From misunderstanding comes desire, in this case.
Strip yourself of your culture, strip yourself of your society, strip yourself of your upbringing. Underneath are the truths as to who one really is.
Yours,
James
Yes, I would agree.
Very well expressed...
but unfortunately false.
Not unfotunately for you, unfortunately for us all!
Life would be easier if you were right.
I do agree that
QUOTE(.broken. @ Oct 11 2008, 04:52 PM)

Pornography wouldn't be anywhere as near as large an industry as it currently is (seconded by drugs) if men were in charge of their sexual desires.
But pornography does not work only on humans but also on monkeys. Male monkeys are willing to give up their bananas to look at pictures of the butt of female monkeys. The fact is that the idea that the problem lies in society has been an idea, a theory, that has been with us for a long time.
And it really has gone full swing in the 60s and 70s. What happened them?
That we started take psychological tests on kids more seriously I assume. That seeing baby girls tuck their train under the blankets, saying "It's alright little train, have a good night", and baby boys using Barbie dolls to shoot like a gun, really went home.
That the fact that if you ask to a kid to complete the phrase :"I play with...", male kids say: "I play with [this toy, that toy]" while female kids say: "Iplay with [this other kid, that other kid]" also went home.
But what really happened was that we started
a) measuring the way hormones are released inside the human body.

understanding how hormones influence the development, and your expression
c) measuring how all this happened in animals.
d) And finally, very recently, study how this is different between men and women.
I would address you to three books.
The Alchemy of Love and Lust from Theresa L. Crenshaw
The Female Brain from Louann Brizendine
and
The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature by Matt Ridley.
for a start.
(Both the female brain and The red queen effect are available from gigapedia, where there is actually quite a library on the biological root of gender differences)
All three are divulgative science, easy to read by anyone, but written by scientists in their respective area, and with a bibliographic reference for each claim. At least one of those books, was written by a woman who started being fully convinced that gender differences were a social construct. Then she had a boy...
Those are the books that I read, but while looking for the title of the first one, just today, I realised the immense body of literaure that in the meantime has sprouted out. Just look into the "Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought" section on Amazon. And among some trash you will find some authenthic gems of scientific studies on the topic.
Among the ones from which I would start is:
Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences by Leonard Sax. May I suggest that at least you read the Amazon presentation of those books.
Respect to the three books I cited, The famale brain will explain you how the brain is really different between a boy and a girl. And the difference starts in the womb. Some hormones get released at certain times of gestation. If this happens correctly then at puberty other hormones get released too, and all goes well. The boy is a boy, the girl is a girl, and they attract each other. But sometimes things don't go smoothly. For example, with twins of different genders you can have a problem, because the hormones released by one fetus get absorbed by the other fetus. Making their gender difference less strong.
So the first will give you an idea of the importance of hormones and biology in the sexual relationship environment. The second will clarify how women are really different creatures. And the third?
The third is there to show how humans and animals are REALLY similar.
Take another common myth. The myth of poligamy and monogamy (and btw, I am in full support of poligamy). The myth is that human beings are corrupted by society. And because of this they cheat on each other. If not they would be
monogamous (according to most women and most christians)
poligamous (according to most men).
Except that:
a) animals cheat too.

In humans, the amount of cheating does not depend on the social status nor the culture a person is in. Wherever they have measure the number of people who were not born of their legal father they always found about the same number. (Something REALLY high, I think even 1 in 5!). The data is in the red queen effect.
So animals do it too. It does not depend on society.
It depends on biology.
Ok, so much for the theory that it is all a social constructed problem.
But why is it so?
And here I can only suggest my own personal opinion, which is not endorsed by any research grant of any kind. It happens so because from nature point of view this is the best way to have kids on the next generations.
You see a society full of zen males, who balance their sexuality perfectly, is not going to be good from the point of view of nature. In general they will not produce enough ofspring and they will not be controlled by females enough. And why is it important that male are controlled sexually by females? Not because they are superior, but because they are needed to keep the kids safe.
So, I agree:
QUOTE(.broken. @ Oct 11 2008, 04:52 PM)

Pornography wouldn't be anywhere as near as large an industry as it currently is (seconded by drugs) if men were in charge of their sexual desires.
But nature, not society is the culprit. And it takes hard work to get free of it. ANd even if you do get free this will still not be a problem from nature's pov. The effort will be so much that only few can do it. And the others?
Have a family,
have kids,
beg for sex.
Or worse.
I think for the first time I can see the concept of original sin, and being baptised by fire. Not the symbol of it, but the actual thing. We were born imperfect because it was needed so. If you want to be free you need to work. Hard. I say this not as a Christian. But as someone who was born and raised in a Christian culture, and thus is pretty familiar with its concepts.